Issue link: https://resources.fenergo.com/i/1544912
H U M A N - G O V E R N E D · A G E N T - E X E C U T E D KYRA:Screen moves routine screening hits from queue to outcome faster. It reduces manual triage, supports materiality assessment and keeps every decision traceable inside Fenergo. "" TECHNOLOGY LEADERS Configure automation inside the governed workflow. Operates inside Fenergo, orchestrated by KYRA via A2A. Teams can configure autonomy levels through a managed knowledge base. No bespoke development required. RISK & COMPLIANCE LEADERS Keep screening outcomes explainable. Every match decision is supported by rationale, materiality assessment and evidence capture. Human oversight remains available where policy, risk or regulation requires it. OPERATIONS LEADERS Reduce screening queues without adding effort. Accelerate routine match resolution and free analysts to focus on higher-value work. Improve throughput without losing visibility or control. Resolve Recommends whether each hit should be confirmed or dismissed. Helps reduce: manual review and false positive handling. Compare Checks candidate details against the Fenergo entity profile. Helps improve: match accuracy and review speed. Assess Supports materiality assessment for confirmed true positives. Helps reduce: repeat review and unnecessary escalation. Explain Creates a rationale for every match decision. Helps improve: consistency, auditability and confidence. Complete Completes resolved tasks where configured. Helps reduce: duplicate updates and handoffs. B U I L T F O R R E G U L A T E D F I N A N C I A L I N S T I T U T I O N S Screening hits resolved faster. Governance built in. See how KYRA:Screen helps teams reduce manual triage, assess materiality and keep every screening outcome traceable inside Fenergo. B U I L T F O R O N B O A R D I N G , K Y C , D U E D I L I G E N C E , C L M A N D P E R I O D I C R E V I E W T E A M S © 2026 Fenergo Limited With KYRA:Screen Routine matches can be resolved where policy allows. P Analysts manually assess low-risk hits, false positives and repeat findings. O O Candidate attributes are compared manually across systems. O True positives require separate materiality review. O Established screening context is reassessed across future journeys. O Audit review depends on fragmented records. P Candidate data is compared against the Fenergo client profile. P Entity-level materiality outcomes can carry forward where appropriate. P Match decisions, rationale, evidence and outcomes stay in the governed record. Materiality assessment can happen within the same screening task. P Without KYRA:Screen fenergo.com Request a Demo